Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V MIN 2 Agam melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terpimpin
Keywords:
classroom action research; guided inquiry; science learning; process skills; elementary educationAbstract
This Classroom Action Research investigates the effectiveness of the guided inquiry model in improving science learning outcomes among fifth-grade students in an Indonesian elementary school. The study was conducted with 28 students at MIN 2 Agam District, during the second semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The intervention was carried out in two cycles, each consisting of three lessons, following the stages of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Data were collected through cognitive tests (20 multiple-choice items: pretest, posttest Cycle I, posttest Cycle II), science process skills observation sheets (4-point rubric), teacher journals, and student response questionnaires (4-point Likert scale). Descriptive quantitative analysis was used to examine changes in mean scores and achievement percentages, while qualitative analysis explored patterns emerging from journals and questionnaires. Findings revealed that the guided inquiry model consistently improved students’ mean scores from 54.6 (pretest) to 70.3 (posttest Cycle I) and 86.1 (posttest Cycle II), with the proportion of students achieving the target increasing from 28.6% to 89.3%. Science process skills and learning motivation also demonstrated notable development. The study concludes that guided inquiry, supported by structured worksheets, teacher scaffolding, and heterogeneous group organization, effectively enhances students’ conceptual understanding, scientific process skills, and motivation in science learning at the elementary level. For publication purposes, the inclusion of raw data, inferential statistical tests, and instrument reliability reporting is recommended to strengthen the evidence.
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1998). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi konstruktivisme. Prestasi Pustaka.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Suyanto. (2015). Pembelajaran inkuiri untuk sekolah dasar. Widya Padjajaran.
Haryono, A. (2016). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar: Pendekatan dan strategi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mira Supia Wati, Sri Mulyana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

